Graham Ellis - Regular updates - my diary
Facebook Moderation - Friends of Assembly Hall
What posts and comments should be allowed in Facebook groups? I find myself as an administrator of the Friends of Melksham Assembly Hall Facebook group - a private group which, however is visible, with well over 200 members.
What is the purpose of the group? "Melksham Assembly Hall - to provide live and recorded entertainment for public audiences of up to 400, and hire for events and groups commensurate with that space, for a customer base primarily in the West Wilts area."
In principle, I am in favour of "free speech" to allow wide ranging discussions, but there are limits. The group should be kept on topic, and to join us to post promotional material about events happening in neighbouring town at the same time that we have a major event public event in the hall, and without (as far as I can see) any previous posts of support and interest is cheeky. To post that without even asking the admins is double cheeky, or thoughtless.
Just about every group I am involved with Friends of Melksham Assembly Hall and Option 24/7 - our Wiltshire bus campaign as admin and members of others such as the Melksham Amateur Photography Group where - and it is so easy - I have accidntally broken a posting rule in the past and had my contribution deleted.
* Please post and help keep the groups busy and interesting
* If you are in and doubt, please ask an admin before posting
* And if you spot something you feel is out of order, please let an admin know.
Published Tuesday, 1st March 2022
A Virtual Hub for MelkshamSome questions you may ask
- What is the Melksham weather forecast for tomorrow?
- Where can I park in Melksham, how long and what cost?
- How do I research my Melksham Ancestors / history of my house?
- Are the Melksham trains running on time?
- When is the next meeting of the Melksham Historical Society?
- Where are keep fit classes in Melksham?
- When does the Melksham splash pad and cafe open?
- What's happening in Melksham about climate change?
- When and how can we replace our Melksham councillors?
- When is the next Melksham Council meeting I can bring a question to and is it on Zoom?
- Who is my councillor and how do I contact him/her?
- Where can I exercise my dog in Melksham?
- Where is my nearest playground?
- Do we have a neighbourhood watch? A neighbourhood plan?
- How do I report graffeti?
- Where can my friends, visiting with a child, stay?
- Is there a hairdresser in Melksham?
- Is [task] something for the Town Council or Wiltshire Council?
- What is the difference between Town, Without, and Area Board?
- Which takeways near me are open at the moment?
- When is the next market? Town Centre or Avonside?
- What is at Scoff this week?
- How do I get to the Royal United Hospital?
- What is Parkrun?
- Are the answers I am getting up to date?
I am just one of 15 Town Councillors here in Melksham and on many days. On many days, I write and share online on a topic that I think may be of interest.
In the last week, 265 different people have visited my blog pages, calling up 448 pages. I'm writing this very early on Monday morning and already 66 people have come to my website to view yesterday's post going into detail on car parking charges for the disabled in Melksham, and 92 on the lighting of the Town Hall in the colours of the Ukrainian flag which I posted on Saturday. 70 have looked at the detail of the Melksham play areas written a couple of days area. This is just the tip of the iceberg - Facebook reports 1220 people reached and 280 reactions to my disabled parking post, 741 and 129 to the Ukrainian flag and 1225 and 45 to play areas, 518 and 138 to my post about Waterloo Live at the Assembly Hall. Feedback is varied - there have already been 60 follow up comments on yesterday's parking post (quite a few, I admit from me as I clarify and explain further for people) and that is a valuable two way conversation in both me informing the public and the public informing me ... with other councillors welcome to read should they wish to do so.
There is clearly an appetite for information and discussion - these are not one-shot visitors I have written 126 posts in the last 11 months, and people keep reacting and answering. I am not unique - look at Facebook groups such as "Sham Shoutouts", the Melksham Community Page, Melksham Discussions, Melksham East Resident pages, and so on.
But my information feed like all these others is very "bitty" - it's one of many, and there is no common indexing. We do co-operate and share (to a greater or lesser extent - a few are protective of their data)
The Virtual Hub project
Your Town Council's Community Development Committee meets a week today (7th March 2022). at their last meeting, they set up a working group of three members to look to procuring a "virtual hub" to bring all these things together, with another councillor volunteering to help them come up with a specification for what they need. I look forward to hearing their report. This is not an easy task, and there is a danger of a lot of money and effort being poured into a project that's only partial and gets limited traction. There is also the possibility of coming up with something rather good.
I set up an online forum and information source (relating to the rail campaigning I do) over a decade ago, and it's still running to this day - a little long in the tooth, but we still have some 4,000 visits per (last) week, with members adding some 300 new items in that time which keeps encouraging people back. It included a map showing immediate issues with trains across the South West, a news feed from the BBC about "things transport", an "On this day", and a searchable archive of some 20,000 topics we've covered and 1,500 mirrored industry documents. There's a hot topic box showing what people are most liking, and a diary of events coming up that people can attend or consultations they can reply to. And there's a polling capability where we can survey our members. About 10 members have been appointed as "moderators" - our inner team who are regular visitors and who can step in if necessary and sort out issues they spot in their day to day visits without it being a big maintenance job. There are a number of things I would like to improve as "webmaster" ... it's not very good in presentation on tablets and mobile phones ... printing out pages for people not on line to take away has some formatting issues ... searching for things is a bit rudimentary ... feeding out to and in from Facebook and Twitter is not as automated as I would like. See http://www.passenger.chat if you want to take a look at this example of a "virtual hub".
The specification and writing of the software and initial "go live" for the system feels like a big task, and I wish the working group well. They really need to consider at this stage the lifetime maintenance cost of the software which will most likely by a higher figure, and the data entry and update effort which will - if the system succeeds - dwarf the other two elements combined.
The system specification is looking at the heart of the system - the engine. Inputs, outputs and feeds are important, as is how the system will be marketed to attract people to come along, read the posts and contribute in the crowded information world. Audience retention (with personalisation) and communication between, and moderation also need to be considered. Well planned and with a blaze of publicity with well populated pages at launch, it can take off well; there may then be a bit of a dip as it's no longer the "latest and greatest" news and will require perseverance and investment in encouraging and making contributions. I look forward to seeing this coming together - happy to make further comment if invited, and indeed I have already passed through ideas and thoughts to the lead officer.
Look at the questions at the top of this post, and the £64,000 questions
- are the answers I'm getting up to date, or from last year?
- what rules and guidelines do we set and how do we develop and apply them?
- can I advertise here and how do I do it?
- how do those without Internet access find out these things?
- can we to a tailored periodic compendium by email?
- how do I get my own thoughts and events added to and found on this data pool?
Not my project - but I wish them well and hope that they will at least take a look at my inputs and do a quick "check list" run to ensure they're aware and have given appropriate consideration to the items I raise.
I look forward to being the "Virtual Hub" being flagged up on my daily feeds when there is something of interest in the future, of it being my "go to" when I want to navigate to anything Melksham, and being able to easily add content there from time to time.
Published Monday, 28th February 2022
PAID Blue Badge parking in Melksham from 1.4.2022 ?!
Parking in Melksham for "Disabled Drivers" - blue badge holders.
At present (until 1st April 2022), Blue Badge holders may park in Wiltshire Council Car Parks in Melksham free of charge, provided they follow national blue badge rules including display of the badge. Wiltshire Council provided 20 spaces across the Melksham car parks (and another 310 in other Wiltshire locations) which are usually wider that the regular spaces, reserved for badge holders, and close to the pedestrian exit from the car park to the facilities they serve.
From 1st April, Wiltshire Council will be charging Blue Badge holders to park in many of their car parks (that's those in which others not using blue badges already have to pay).
1. Should blue badge holders pay?
2. If blue badge holders have to pay, how easy (or otherwise) is that for them?
3. If blue badge holders don't park in the car parks once payment is introduced, what will they do instead, and what will the ramifications be?
1. Should they pay?
I have a huge sympathy for those who are less able due to physical or other difficulties and feel we have a special duty of care to them. Ideally, in financial terms that should be in helping them by providing decent financial support and let them choose (and pay for) extra services that they need. But this is not an ideal world, and the government choses to buy services for them rather than give them the choice, and in that environment then yes, they should have financial parking concessions.
2. If they have to pay, how easy will it be?
Potentially, it won't be easy. I looked at Kings Street and Central car parks yesterday - the two in my ward - and in both cases the spaces are, correctly, near to the pedestrian exits from the car park. But, incorrect for those who are hard of movement, the pay machines are away across the car park. Worse, the pay machines are notorious for being out of action; yesterday, for example, only the machine at the rear of Central Car Park was in operation. Further, the coin slots are at a level that make them difficult for wheelchair users or others who are height impaired. We are told new machines are coming in. If they are located at the pedestrian exits, are wheelchair accessible, and use a system which allows payment without doubling back to the car, good, but should the introduction of charging the disabled not be deferred until this new system is in place? Otherwise, Wiltshire Council should be challenged under the 2010 Equalities Act - the successor to "Disability Discrimination".
Parkers can also pay by phone. This will work for some, but not for all. An appropriate phone is needed, and a parker who is nimble enough with their fingers an well enough up on the IT stuff. I admit to no personal experience of this - I walk into Melksham as I live close by (very occasionally catch the bus to the far end and walk back). I tried to register at home, but the system was such registration was a process that couldn't be completed until the first time I was parking. The payment by phone system may be a good alternative for some, but it cannot be the only solution for the disabled
3. What if they don't park in WC car parks any longer?
It has been pointed out that Blue Badge holders may park for free, for up to 3 hours, on yellow lines where there is no loading restriction. Yellow lines exist to aid traffic flow, and there is potential for a significant increase in on-street parking by blue badge holders to the detriment of traffic flow.
Blue Badge spaces exist in all supermarket car parks, and the supermarkets include the cost of parking in their pricing of good - so they're free at the point of use. There is a likelihood that some Town Centre business will transfer to the supermarkets.
It is possible that some blue badge holders may use the bus instead, and that some will order online and have a delivery, with some depending on their care services for a facility which they currently use themselves.
I have no measure of the elasticity of these changes, and I have not read any. The best I have seen is a suggestion "let's see how it goes" - however, once people change their habits (and are blocking the streets or shopping out of town) it will be an uphill struggle to persuade them back.
1. It has been stated by Councillor Alford that only 30% of drivers parking with a Blue Badge are disabled, as part of his explanation of the changes. I was puzzled by this at first, but note that some blue badge holders cannot themselves drive, and are passengers in the car - for example a carer driving a very old person, or a mother with a child in a wheelchair with Oxygen tanks to contend with. I am also unsure of cases where someone may have very limited mobility indeed, but not be registered disabled. I have requested clarification of this "30%" and will update this note if I receive it. There IS a good point that some carer drivers MAY be able to leave their dependant at the car while they tootle off to the payment machine.
2. To get myself some idea of where people shop (how important is the Town Centre) is these days, I ran a poll over the last week - across a wider area and potentially skewed because it's a specialist interest forum. But up to date as we come out of legal restrictions and look forward. "Which of these do you use regularly for grocery shopping?". Figures given are percentages, sample size 37, voters allowed to select multiple options (and most did)
35,Corner Store (in person)
49,High Street / Town Centre (in person)
19,Market (in person)
81,Supermarket (in person and take goods home with you)
5,Shopping Mall (in person)
0,Supermarket (choose in person and they deliver)
3,Supermarket (click and collect)
14,Amazon or similar (order online and they deliver)
24,Supermarket (order online and they deliver)
8,Independent online and they have carrier deliver
5,My partner / carer / butler does the regular grocery shopping
0,Don't know - it just turns up
22,Farm shop (in person)
5,Farm shop / regular order and delivered
3. I visited Melksham Town Centre on Friday and Saturday. On Friday, all 8 places in Central Car Park were in use and two cars in the next places (for mother and child too) had blue badges on display. On Saturday, there were five cars in the 8+2 = 10 spaces. One car in a disabled space was not displaying a blue badge. The pay machine nearest the blue badge spaces was "Not in Use". On Saturday (only) I noted 3 spaces in King Street with just one in use.
4. The current "repay" scheme where you can get two (or one, say some signs) of your payment for packing back at certain stores is little used. I put this down to lack of knowledge, confusion as to how it works, and a lot of hassle for the one hour at 30p. Probably costs more to administer than in returned payments.
1. I consider that Wiltshire Council should provide a DDA compliant solution in their own car parks, from which they already collect money from most parkers. It should not be the responsibility of the Town to do what the County should do. However, I would support us taking a pragmatic position and buy parking for blue badge holders in Central Car Park up to a certain price, to be defined. NOT "at any price"
2. I would support a "purple badge" add on to the blue badge for a limited annual fee, allowing holders to park at no extra charge and circumventing the hassle of paying each time.
Edit to add, after a Facebook question on this I may have been a bit short on that as I only mentioned the idea in passing. The idea is an extra that can be purchased for a year and can be displayed in addition to a blue badge, which would entitle the user to park for no extra charge with the blue badge - a sort of parking season ticket, saving the hassle of paying each time (and also encouraging more visits as it would no longer be pay-per-visit). Thanks for noting that my explanation was limited - I'll go back to my blog and see if I can expand it.
3. I would encourage Wiltshire Council to review their decision to charge Blue Badge holders for parking in their car parks while street parking on yellow lines with Blue Badges is allowed, and while payment remains difficult for people who are restricted enough to merit a badge - they are not usually at all easy to obtain.
If readers wish to get in touch with your Wiltshire Councillor, they are Councillors Hubbard, Sankey, Oatley and Alford. It is Wiltshire Coucil who own and run these car parks - your Town Council is looking to "pick up the pieces".
My thanks to the informed discussions with other Town councillors who have help me in looking into this, and has given me the strength of knowledges that I am far from alone on these concerns.
Published Sunday, 27th February 2022
Melksham Town Hall / Ukrainian flagAs from dusk tonight (26th February 2022), Melksham Town Hall
Update - 18:45 Melksham Town Hall now lit in Yellow and Blue - the colours of the Ukrainian flage - in a show of sympathetic support for the people of Ukraine. Image on this post changed to show our Town Hall lit up.
Update - 10:30 Across the UK, many public buildings are being lit with the Ukrainian flag in a show of sympathetic support for the people of Ukraine. Just after lunchtime yesterday, Councillor Rabey proposed via email that we in Melksham should do so too. However, Town Council policy, to which our staff work, includes:
Ordinarily and in the interests of impartiality, the flag of another nation or cause will not be flown. However the Town Mayor in liaison with the Town Clerk may exercise discretion or seek a motion from Council to determine when the Town Council will fly its flag(s) at half-mast and/or fly the flag of another nation state or cause as a mark of respect from the Council and the community in particular circumstances that are deemed to be appropriate.
With the mayor absent at present, the natural (almost automatic) way for an exception to the policy wasn't directly open, and staff really cannot go against policy without a very clear lead. There was a considerable flow of emails yesterday afternoon with the majority of councillors responding. Some expressed concern asking "are others doing this" and "how do we go about it in the absence of the mayor" but in the end all elected members involved in the conversation (I think, looking back) were in favour. The Deputy Mayor is supportive, and one of our councillors is still in touch with the mayor and reported him to be supportive too. So, in effect, a motion from Council unanimously supported and we can dispense with motion notice period, etc - this one was blindingly obvious.
Picture Now - Melksham Town Hall with the colours of the Ukraining flag. Our thanks to Paul Weymouth of Light Fantastic for setting this up ... Paul picture in front of the Town Hall with our Deputy Mayor, Colin Goodhind.
With all this going on, I perhaps other councillors concentrated on working out what to do, and doing the job, without taking the time out to tell our residents what we were doing. Your Town Councillors are volunteers - we all have other interests outside the council, which for some include full time jobs and for some include being Wiltshire Councillors too. So having most of us respond yesterday was remarkable, and have others silent over a few hours only to be expected.
There are other things very much on my Town Councillor's plate at present:
1. I am concerned that we have lost yet another member of our team, once again without reason being given and without even a "thank you for what Xxxxx" has done for us. Far too much of a recurring pattern for my liking. I am advised that it is normal not to give a reason when someone leaves, and that a member of the staffing committee is "completely satisfied with how this has been handled". Sadly, I am not satisfied, and I do not consider it normal for people to leave without thanks for their work or any explanation. There may be exceptional circumstances, but this is a repeating pattern which occupies me. Since I was elected 9 months ago, I know of six staff departures and that feels to be an incredibly high turnover, and a big cost bearing in mind the investment made into staff, and the investment the make in us in return; we are the poorer from the loss of both experienced people, and younger people too who bring an enthusiam but also a need for help and upport as they take a job very early in their career.
2. The decision by Wiltshire Council to start charging blue badge holders to park in their car parks (and increase charges for others, and withdraw the free parking on Sundays and 2 special days designated by the Town Council) is exercising me and other councillors. There are two sections to this issue - (i) should blue badge holders be asked to pay? and (ii) if they are asked to pay, do we actually make it practical for them to pay? There is a whole blog to follow on this - I'm going to leave it to post until tomorrow, along with wider comment on disabled access to the Town Centre.
3. I am concerned at the flow of Town and Town Council information to our residents. The incident I started this post with - the lack of telling you what we were / are doing about the Ukrainian flag is just a syptom of a major concern. I know what I would like to see. The Community Development Committee (which I am not on) meets a week on Monday to hear from their "virtual hub working group"; they are being advised by the mayor helping them draw up a spec of what's needed and I look forward to hearing their proposals. I should add that we have some excellent information flowing out already - the team doing it probably need more effective tools for doing this, and perhaps re-arrangement to get more up there quickly and with a wider readership. And perhaps that's what the working group is looking at.
Published Saturday, 26th February 2022
Melksham South Play AreasA Tours for councillors elected last year organised by the team - I went around on 22nd February 2022. Five play and recreation areas provided and maintained by Wiltshire Council in South Ward.
Although I'm not on the Assets and Amenities Committee, I took advantage of the availability of a place on the tour - the only South Ward representative or resident councillor to do so. Councillors Jacqui Crundell and Colin Goodhind from South Ward are on this committee and if you have any specific queries, I would suggest they are more directly in touch with what's what even though I'm the one writing this up.
A big THANK YOU to the officers who showed us around and gave us an "insider" appreciation of The Council's role and activities
(On map in green) In South Ward, we have:
5. Dorset Crescent - a few pieces of equipment and a large grassy area. High net barrier for no apparent reason - perhaps there was a netball pitch there? Primrose, no more than a few yards away in Melksham East offers much more but perhaps DC still useful to keep children close. Mind, very much a senior area close by.
Play equipment in use - hence no picture of it to be published
1. Hazelwood - a small / local play area which is starting to show its age. I understand that the fence around it has been painted by nearby residents, and the area stuck me as tired but still loved. Easy access to Town Centre via Orchard Gardens, but I suspect little known to many. With a porous gate into the Campus, could be a real asset for visitors to that with small children
2. Lewington - a gem. Small, but modern and in good condition. Well overlooked by houses, so largely self policing. I wondered how long interest in this equipment will last - however, even in February when we looked, mum and two toddlers came along and were enjoying it.
4. Speedwell Close - compact, modern play area for smaller children. Well overlooked from 'supervising' houses.
3. Spring Meadow - a very big area though with sparse and well worn equipment. Serves the lower end of Kenilworth Road estate (Longford Road and Windsor Avenue) as well as the bottom of Campion Drive.
(On map in Blue). Nearby, other play and recreation areas are:
12. KGV (various facilities)
11. The Woody / Clackers Brook
On the map in Grey. - other play area looked after by the Town Council - ranging from a single goal post on a field at Forester's Park to an impressive array of equipment and an even more impressive set of signage at Methuen Avenue.
On the map in Red - public play areas NOT managed by the Town Council. I may have missed some - and neither does my map include any play areas in Melksham Without.
And general notes
* We have an excess of signage - not only immediate instructions but complex bylaw posters too, from various bodies - Town, District, County. Could we unify, standardise, clarify ... perhaps add QR code, online links, phone number. Suggest standard logos - Red for "no" and "green" for yes (orange for "discouraged") to all appear in all parks? Two signs for each location - the "standard" one plus a local choice? Which raises the question of local pride and ownership
* How much are the parks used? It wasn't very much on the bleak February day we went around, but wear and mud suggest that they ARE used at least enough for some of the surfaces / gate areas to become impassable. Get more data? Ask people to tell us?
* We have an incredibly mixed bag ... and I suspect many residents don't know what there is outside there immediate area. Can we better inform and get better use; as we can't / don't charge for use, better use would increase expense. Would fellow councillors consider this a "loss" to be avoided (as putting in to the Assembly Hall is regarded) or a cost (as opening public loos is) which is to be encouraged for the facility it provides?
* Regular patrolling and routine maintenance such as clearing bins and mowing is a considerable load on our team - however, with the possible exception of Dorset and Primrose, the areas are well separated and any reduction in numbers of areas would be a serious degradation of facilities. Conversely, there are a few places (Church Lane, not my ward, and Warwick Crescent) which seem a long way from any.
* The strategy needs to be provided by Assets and Amenities as to update / replace / reduce these areas - whether they wish us to end up with a few smart areas, continue with a mixed bag, invest heavily - but then would that be in things which are just fashionable and not really what the kids want. As was commented - "we have to compete against computer games these days".
Food for thought, thanks for the tour, I look forward to seeing how the councillors concerned and the staff progress this in coming years, and offer my support (for what it's worth) to well justified and well rounded proposals.
Published Wednesday, 23rd February 2022
Waterloo Live - the Assembly Hall's Waterloo?Really good to have "Waterloo Live" at the Assembly Hall last night - a really enjoyable evening, enjoyed by lots of people (around 300) at £20 each (= £6000, plus say another £1000 of bar takings). Good to see a fellow councillor in the audience - perhaps would have been good to see more at this important facility, and on such a fantastic evening.
There's no secret that the Assembly Hall is run down from decades of wear and missed maintenance, and is closely connected to Wiltshire Council's Blue Pool which they expect to demolish later in the year when their Campus opens. The Assembly Hall needs to be saved - not necessarily the same building, perhaps not even on the same site (though where else in the town can we be noisy?) but certainly with that same capacity at least, and with the same 'ownership' of the community too. It's the people far more that the building.
Covid has not been kind to Assembly Hall finances, and sadly the council you elected last May had an absolute majority who declared our organiser of events such as that last night redundant. The remaining team who look after the hall have done a wonderful job, but the days of such events sponsored by your council are running out - 3 months to go, I believe. And then the finances look even more interesting and we hope (and need to work with) other people to organise events. Really a sad decision to cease sponsoring such events, just at the very time that we're all on our way back from Covid.
Funny (peculiar) that your council sees the King George V park, which costs us more to run than it generates in income, as an expense to be accepted, but sees the Assembly Hall, which also costs us more to run than it generates in income, as a loss which must be slashed.
Sad that those councillors who we have ONLY seen in the Assembly Hall when council meeting were held there for Covid distancing are not being supportive of continuing events like last night's at the very time they are clearly making a popular comeback.
Published Sunday, 20th February 2022
Bridge to ASDA?Question asked: "What about a Bridge over the A350 / Melksham bypass to ASDA, like the bridge over the main road to Tesco in Trowbridge?"
It's a good idea to segragate foot, cycle, scooter and powered traffic (cars, buses, lorries) where practical and it works via a bridge in Trowbridge. Coming from the Town Centre and park, pedestrians are already on a higher level and can walk straight ahead onto the bridge. There is then a long ramp down to the Longfield Road area of the town, making the bridge a natural route through. A set of steps down allows access to Tesco, athough those who cannot use steps can carry on down the slope and double back. But the geography in Melksham is different.
1. Foot and cycle bridges need to attract people to use them. And on a piece of flat land as we have around ASDA, the idea of going up and down ramps or steps might put people off. Look at Poole and Lincoln (railway crossings with heavy pedestrian use) and see just how many people wait for the train to pass rather than using the bridge - the bridges and underutilised.
2. New bridges must (legal requirement) be wheelchair accessible - ramps or lifts. In the Melksham location, a ramp would need to double back on itself with either steps in addition (example - Worle) or it would irritate the heck out of users where no steps are provided (example - Ashchurch) or would need lifts (example - Chippenham) at greater and ongoing operational expense.
3. There is already a pedestrian crossing across the road, so traffic is already separate already by time rather than by height. That eats into the amount of traffic than can pass. If a bypass is built avoiding this section of road, the case for a bridge becomes less, but if a bypass is not built (an especially if Bath continues to turn through traffic away from Cleveland Bridge) the case for something to replace the crossing becomes greater - though that still leaves the first two issues.
So - are there other options to get people on foot and cycles to ASDA (and perhsps in future to a new residential across the railway - another story)
A. From the subway to the station under the A350, another subway under the A365 which at that point is at a higher level would connect Old Bath Road, the railway station / Bath Road and the north of the ASDA area on the flat, but with pedestrian traffic segragated from road traffic
B. A footway/cycleway from the entrance to Melksham Cemetry on the verge of the bypass over Challymead Bridge to Farmer's roundabout would provide better connectivity from Melksham South (Hazelwood Road area) to both ASDA and the station area.
The bridge we're talking about is in Melksham (North) ward, so really this is one for Saffey Rabey and Phil Alford - however, option (B) comes into South. I do personally have some background on pedestraian bridges and knowledge of getting to the station, hence my feeling comfortable to comment.
I was also asked about the bypass on by the questioner I am answering. See ((here)) and ((here)) and ((here)) for - copious - comments previously made before (yep, back to my manifesto) and after the Town Council elections.
Please remember - as Town Councillors we have no powers but the power to persuade and inform on so many matter such as these - do have a chat with your Wiltshire Councillor.
Published Saturday, 19th February 2022
Happy to ChatYesterday, I took a trip out to clear the cobwebs of winter, to enjoy the feel of the wind on the hills, the crashing of the waves on the beach, and the tranquillity of wooded glades. 2022 has started with the loss of several good 'professional' friends with whom I've campaigned for many years - fixtures in our landscape, and with the loss of our dog Billy too at the beginning of this month. I have written much on all three. Very, very much remembered with fondness, but the message here is "open for business" as Nigel and Jo would have encouraged, and as Billy would have accompanied and supported me on.
On Weymouth Sea Front, I came across this sign on a bench. "The Happy to Chat Bench. Sit here if you don't mind someone stopping to say 'Hello'". And - my thought - what a good idea. Not for the only bench somewhere, but perhaps one of the benches in the midst of KGV parki. Not really for lonely people to sit there, but rather where people in family or friend groups can sit, and others who perhaps are in need of a few words known they will be welcome, and can, indeed, say "hello". Just a word or two can make a huge difference.
Lisa and I live in a "Happy to Chat" house. We're in South Ward, which I represent (and am learning still how better to represent) on the town council, and our door is open - the physical one not quite at all times (best check ahead I'm going to be around unless you risk taking pot luck), the phone one far more, and the online / message door 24x7 though response is not always immediate. I do want to hear what bugs you and what pleases you, to help (with what few tools I have) you, and perhaps to motivate. And that's whether or not you voted for me. We may have a hedge at the front of our home, but it's porous to reduce the sound of the road, and not solid to block us off from the outside.
Added - 15th February 2022
The idea of a "Happy to Chat" bench has been positively received by Melksham Town councillors - a couple just looking to make sure that it's not the only bench in a part of the town so that there remains seating for those who are preferring their own company. But there are 14 benches around the circuit in the KGV park, and two in particular struck me as good candidates - for a choice of one such bench. As an aside, there are also 5 benches in the Dog Bark, but there is little point in making any of them "Happy to Chat" because people who take their dogs there are very much prepared for interaction! I have also checked with the amenities team who maintain the park, and they have no problem with the idea.
So - where now? At the Town Council's Asset and Amenities Commitee meeting last night (which I watched on Zoom), the subject of extra benches, sponsoring benches (and sponsoring roundabouts mentioned too) came up, and it looks like a whole policy and process will be developed, probably with a report back to the next meeting of that committee on 19th April. I am hopeful, but far from certain, that we may be able to fast track a "Happy to Chat" sign on a single bench before Spring. I would prefer not to wait for a policy to be decided and implemented and an application made ... by which time it could be high summer or even autumn, but other may take the view that suggestions such as mine which are in the pipeline should wait until the policy is set.
Published Sunday, 13th February 2022
Campus - what to do with other public assets"Melksham Campus" will open later this year. And the library and the swimming pool will move into the new building. I was on the "SCOB" - Shadow Campus Operation Board - a decade ago, and at that time the plan was a single site facility for Wiltshire Council, with eight (I think it was) eight other properties / sites being sold off. Some are outside the town (in Melksham Without), and at least one other has, I think, been removed from the Unitary Council's books already. But what happens to the remaining properties? And while that question's being addressed, wouldn't it be a good idea to take a wider view and at least give some thought as to how their future will fit in with the future of other Wiltshire Council and Town Council assets.
We should be mindful of what's wanted for the future at this time that so many things are moving around all at once and perhaps life expired, and we're also seeing major social changes brought on by climate change, covid, and the information age all of which were absent last "time around".
On Monday evening, Melksham Town Council appointed three members to meet with Wiltshire Council members and officers to discuss publicly owned assets in Melksham; those three are Councillors Simon Crundell, Pat Aves and myself, and a first meeting was held via Teams the following night. There are some tough questions to be asked; at this stage, over a very short period, we'll be looking at the scope and the art of the possible, and how things fit in with aspirations and affordability. Serious stuff, in co-ordination with other work and papers such as Priority for People, the Neighbourhood Plan and the Local Plan. And previous work, reports and ideas to be used as tools for us to learn from - repeat the good and avoid the bad.
Rather than speculate on what could be done and worry people with silly early ideas, I bring you an idea from the Wiltshire Times in 1955 who's time has passed. This didn't happen ... neither did the plan to put a road through from The Bear to the Church Street Car Park, demolishing historic buildings but it just might have meant that we could be considering a pedestrianised High Street now.
Published Wednesday, 26th January 2022
Town precept - how Melksham comparesThis bar chart shos how the Town council precept in Melksham compares to the other towns in Wiltshire for the current year. With the only exceptions being towns with a strong MOD presence (where it's the MOD rather than the civil local council who do much of the provision), we have the lowest town precept in the county and will continue to do so next year - unless some other town decides to make a huge cut.
Readers who live in (rural) parishes rather than towns will find that their parish council precept is much lower - almost without exception. That's because Town Councils provide facilities for their wider community area - town centre street scene, public loos, parks, halls, information and much more at the expense of the people who live in their designated "built up" area but for the benefit of their wider economic catchment.
"Unfair" you might say - "why should we pay for the non-residents" - and you would probably be right. But I suspect we need to be pragmatic and accept that situation - continuing our charitable gift of a town that welcomes (and pays for) people from "the villages". The alternative is for the Town Council to start charging for the use of parks, toilets, the Town Centre, etc - we already charge for use of the Assembly Hall. Perhaps the idea is not so stupid - watching on the news over Christmas, Bristol is talking about charging organised groups in their parks, and perhaps folks like ParkRun and Party in the Park and the River and Food festival should be paying [more] to the Town Council.
Published Saturday, 1st January 2022