Main Content

Graham Ellis - Regular updates - my diary

Links in this page:
Neighbourhood Issues
Options to get to the station
Alternative Path?
FoMAH - This Week (13.9.2021)
Melksham Transport User Group
Staff and role changes at MTC
Dog Bark - KGV Park
Upcoming Bus Improvements
on Personal Electric Vehicles
(Back to top of page)
Some other pages on this site:
Home page
Graham Ellis - background and • views
Graham Ellis - diary and • diary index
Philosophies of working as a town councillor
The Role of the Town Council and Councillors
How YOU can help and • Contact me
Links to other web sites and • pictures
Through April 2021, I posted most days. Thereafter (elected) you hear from me here at least once a week.

Area Board - Summary, 22.9.2021


From last night's Melksham Area Board - summary notes I took during the meeting, telling you the headlines of topics that came up.

The Melksham Community Area no longer includes Atworth, nor Seend and a number of other parishes that were included on the southern flank before. This is part of boundary adjustments designed to keep the population of each area roughly the same; with the growth of Melksham itself, some of the villages have been transferred out to balance Illustration - old (left) and new (right) community areas - changed, May 2021.

Announcements:
* Riverside Path - resurfaced; safety and flooding
* Campus Swimming Pool - fitting out under way

Police update:
* KGV / Police activity continues
* Primrose Drive - removed as a priority. 98% residents not concenred. Just one incident of misuse of path

Councillor Sankey:
* Confirmation that Campus budget used for Skate Park and Oakfield stadium which are described as "part of the Campus offering"
* Discussion on CCTV at Skate Park.

Councillor Alford:
* Ash Dieback. Risk of injury from falling trees and branched near public rights of way. Looking at replanting by WC
* Public Consulations - "crucial as we move forward" - Climate change, green and blue strategies.
* WC acknowldged issuse 2.2019 to be carbon neutral by 2030. WC can influnce 1/3 of emissions. Encourage Town and Parishes to engage.

Dave Thomas of Wiltshire Council:
* 5 years highways maintennce plan. Around £400,000 per annum. Useful background to be aware of.
* State of roads program. Why is it that roads get resurfaced can ne undone by utilities? e.g. Nick Holder asking for Semington Road. A: 12 months notice needs to be given to then have a 12 month moratorium. Only applies to longitudional. Not protect transverse connections. "We try as much as possible but they have a right. And we try voluntarily to work together. Problem is high profile locations."
* JH - is that all the works planed? A: No - there will be reactive works. If we insprect and find others, there will be reactive and they can be fairly large patching areas. Purpose - shock at how little of Melksham Town. JH - often new roads but challenging pavements. Can be machine laid rather than had laid - different groupings. Different program, different materials.

Councillor Holder:
* Vacinaion update - as of yesterday started boosters at Spencers. Patients will be contacted directly. Health and social care. Only allowed 180 day after 2nd vacination.
* Older persons champion. 2 expressions of interest. Need to agree as an area board. We have a dedicated area board coming up.

Peter Dunford:
* Older persons special on 22nd October. Hoping Assembly Hall
* To include transport with a view to gatering pririties for action. Also to announce who the champion would be.
* To ensure due process, invite others via MIN. JS - support special meetimgs. [but 2019 all the norms only]
* 8th December board - priorities for action. Want to focus on a small number of areas.

"Votes by disent" right though evening - so an assumption that all concillors were in agreement. Probably correct as references were made to the "premeeting meeting" where councillors discuss the issues witout the public present.

Grants:

* 2385 Melksham Squadron - £5014 (50%)
rest from volunteer time, fees, etc
JH - talk of "pre-meeting".
Grant given.

* WW Model Car Club - £955 for Assy Hall
Karen Potter for new computer
ALSO for hire car for newcomers to try.
Grant given.

* Keevil PC - £379 for paved area.
Q - is there a parish contributon
A - we have spent £900 on a table
Grant given.

* MTC - £345 for defrib cabinet
ONLY 50% request - this is a correction
Ask by JH, propose by PA
Grant given.

* Youth Grant - JH asking for £5000
for team talk service.
Ask for specific delivery at Canberra.
Explosion of use.
Seed funding for addnl councillor
Grant given.

* Celebrating Age Wiltshire for £1500(?)
Grant given.

* Melksham Talking Newspaper for £500
"Chippenham TN" group, MKM edition
MIN to tape for partially sited
Grant given.

Public Participation
There were no questions from the public (indeed - apart from answering a coupl of questions on grants - I don't think a single member of the public spoke all evening!

Next business meeting - 8.12.2021

E&OE - all above as understood by Graham Ellis


Published Thursday, 23rd September 2021

Neighbourhood Issues

I am one of your four town (parish) councillors in Melksham. As a Town Councillor, I have no statutory authority, but you have elected me to help look after some of your interests for four years, to inform and advise and offer help and oil wheels if I can. Town and parish councillors are unique in that they have responsibilities (if you call them that) over a very small area, and unique in that they receive no remunerations for their efforts - it's purely a voluntary role, unlike the unitary council or MP levels.

I put together this map yesterday - dropping pins onto specific places where issues have been raised. Some resolved (road issues on Spa Road, footpath near the bypass), some refusals (church gate) and many more still under way; it's a pleasant surprise when there are 'instant' results.

Please do get in touch if I can help. Where something is already being looked after by another councillor, I should (and will) defer to them, and I would really appreciate it if you don't ask lots of us councillors separately to do the same thing. Working together, yes, by all means - Colin, Jacqui, Jon and me are all different people and if appropriate can bring a far wider experience than just one person.

P.S. Neighbourhood issues are so often about us all living and working together and involve consideration and compromise for the best long term and happy solutions. Yellow lines on the road, bollards and gates on public rights of way, etc, are rarely the way to go.

P.P.S. I personally stood for town council with some prior knowledge from public transport campaigning, and my time as president of the Chamber of Commerce, of just how much time it would take; being newly retired and with another volunteer role not happening, I have the time (and it was planned) to do these things. We do not want a council packed with retired people - we want young blood and dynamic thought, but how on earth those younger councillors could cope if they took on things to the same degree I can, I do not know. Please do not assume that just because I can offer to help that other councillors can do so in the same way. Family and paid work has to come first for all of us, and there may be some who have bitten off more than they expected to chew.


Published Tuesday, 21st September 2021

Options to get to the station

To catch the 11:30 train on Saturday, I had a choice. I could have left my front door (on Spa Road) at ...
* 10:47 to catch the bus to near the station
* 11:05 to walk to the station
* 11:10 for a taxi to the station (allowing a few minutes slack)
- 11:15 to cycle to the station and secure the cycle there
- 11:15 to drive to the station and pay for the car park
- 11:18 to cycle to the station and take it on the train
* 11:20 for a lift to the station
There should have been time at the station from the 10:47 bus to grab myself a quick cup of coffee to take on the train too. In all other cases, I would have allowed an extra five minutes for that, and a little longer if I wanted to grab a freshly made sandwich or breakfast.

I was headed for Yatton - a chance to catch up with old friends - with a change of trains at Trowbridge, through Bath and change at Bristol. Cost me £8.40 return (would have been £12.80 without a senior railcard), giving lie so the rumour that all rail fares are exorbitant.

On my return, the train I was on from Bristol would have missed the connection at Trowbridge to Melksham by 9 minutes - next one not for another 2 hours. I could have caught an alternative train and changed at Chippenham - still the best part of an hour to wait somewhere - so I took the Faresaver bus from Bath Bus Station (unlike Melksham, Chippenham or Trowbridge, the main bus hub is close to the station) - 15 minute or so change in Bath, and the 272 dropped me directly across the road from my home.

Interesting to note ... only four of the seven options available to me in the morning allowed me to go out by rail and back by bus (those marked with a "*" - the others would have left me with a cycle in Bath that could not come on the bus, or a personal vehicle at the station which needed picking up.

My train ticket did cover the bus fare. You would think, wouldn't you, that it would be sensible for the public transport operators to work together on routes that are infrequent at times so that customers can have the benefit of going on the next available service, be it bus or train - but apparently not. With a senior bus card, and my journey during the hours of validity, I did not have to pay what I believe would have been £6 for the journey.

Published Monday, 20th September 2021

Alternative Path?

The path from Place Road (just off the Market Place) to the Cricket, Bowls and Tennis clubs behind Melksham House is closed for just over six months while work is done on the new Campus car park, with a signposted diversion all the way round via the Centre of town and Church Road, other routes via the Melksham House gates also being closed at present.

I have been asked (in my Parish Councillor Role) to see if the gate on Place Road to the Churchyard could be opened - not as a public right of way, but as a "permissive path" for just the duration of the closure - it would save a long walk around, and using permissive path methods it would not become a public right of way permanently. And that seems like a good idea - a temporary diversion, if you like. When I've asked about this (informally) before, I've heard various stories. The sad answer is that it's up to the Church, and they have said it can't be done, offering me this explanation to clarify why it is not possible:


We have already received enquiries with the same request as yours, that is to open the gates between Place Road and the Churchyard to reduce the length of the re-route of the current footpath.

In answer, firstly, you may already know but Place Road is a private road.

The situation with the access is that currently, all the Place Road residents have a key to those gates and can use them at any time, but lock them afterwards. The Church also has keys and the legal situation when Place Road was constructed in the late 19th Century was that the Church had access through the gates “either side of divine service for those attending”. This arrangement is still technically in place.

Also, in much more recent times our Insurance Company has requested that these gates be locked, certainly during the hours of darkness to deter thieves, in an area not easily visible. We have had lead stolen off the church roof twice in recent years.

So you see that all is not as simple as it seems, as we do not have “control” of the access.

I agree that in principle a “permissive path” arrangement would seem be a solution, but regret that in this case this is not possible.


I have written back to see if the gate could be unlocked during daylight hours to next spring; I really don't see much call to go to the sports clubs at night (though the Melkshas Amateur Photography Group and others do meet at the Cricket Club all year) and I will update this post if I hear back with a positive but limited (in this way) outcome. In the meantime, Thank You to the Church authorities for considering the request from the residents of South Ward.

Published Wednesday, 15th September 2021

FoMAH - This Week (13.9.2021)

Terri and Paul meet with the Town Clerk this week, then (Thursday evening 16th September, from 19:00) will be briefing the group in a combine Zoom/In-Real-Life meeting. We don't know what the outcome of that meeting will be, and that makes it hard to set an agenda with any certainly, but indicators are excellent that the Town Council team, Together for Melksham, our MP and the Conservative Group are all looking for a positive route forward with a vibrant, yet "affordable", and sustainable future.

On Saturday 18th, Lisa and I are going to see "ELO Beatles Beyond present The Lynne & McCartney Story at The Hall - Tickets ((here)) at £16. Click on the image for links to upcoming events bookable via TicketSource. Those are just the tip of the iceberg - something is happening at The Hall every Saturday into next year, and many days between too.



The Zoom code for the Thursday meeting is:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86931577325?pwd=aHNMUFpkNnhuMnVETWgwQTJseVdEUT09
That's Meeting ID: 869 3157 7325 Passcode: 979528
One tap mobile: +442034815240,,86931577325#,,,,*979528# United Kingdom

All are welcome by Zoom. If you came in person last time, it's going to be the sae venue (NOT The Hall yet) - if you didn't please let me know and I can send you details in a message; we have plenty of space on Zoom, but are limited in the room itself.

One of the elements I see as key to this working is positive partnership. Everyone working together for shared goals. And especially valuable in achieving that are the skills already on the council team, and in the hall's current users and supporters. I am delighted to see from and answer to a voter's questions: "The council has been assured by the Town Clerk that the Assembly Hall will be managed properly, council has the utmost confidence in the operation line management of the officer team in all aspects of running the Assembly Hall. Council also welcomes the opportunity to work with the community (FOMAH) to secure the long term future of the Assembly Hall and how it can be better utilised."

I can't speak for FoMAH - we're not yet properly constituted, and on that basis no-one really can (except Paul and Terri to the Town Council) - but I am going to personally re-iterate my desire to work with staff, user and volunteer skills, and I want to remind everyone (and record it here for posterity!) that FoMAH in no way was suggested / set up in order to displace any staff; I would be very unhappy indeed if it were to do so in the foreseeable future too. It was / is being set up after staff reductions are a fete acccompli - and indeed after the Town Council received a report from its own officer stating the the status quo was not an option, bearing in mind that staff levels have already been reduced.



Agenda for 16th September.
1. Introduction around the room, and welcome
2. Report back from Paul and Terri
3. Where we go from here
?4. Structures
?5. Committee / officers / etc
?6. Date of next meeting

Last time, as a first meeting, I offered a guiding slide set (URL just below) to help bring everyone up to speed. Some have indicated that this was stuff they knew already and didn't feel their time on it was well spend for them. Well - tough - others had gaps filled in, and we have that starting "checkpoint". However, there is no need for such a set / session at this second meeting. Newcomers are encouraged to read ahead, and the group is a friendly group (heck, it's in the title) so one of us can fill you in before hand or after if you are new to this.



2nd September meeting report - informal write up by Graham Ellis

Slide set from 2nd September meeting (including a review of where we are and where we should be looking) at http://www.fomah.org.uk/2021902slides.pdf ... recording of meeting at http://www.fomah.org.uk/zoom_20210902.mp4 (huge file - until 16th Sept only)

There were around 20 people present at the meeting, split almost equally between those present in real life and those on Zoom, and it was a real "quality" gathering.

Whilst there was some concern as to how we got to this point (and some present expressed a lack of trust in the Town Council) the overall view was to see the current discussions as an opportunity. We are ALL moving forward whilst being aware of the concerns.

Good groundwork, common goal wanting to see positive outcome, vibrant hall needed, sustainable economic model, wide range of events to be held way in to the future. The meeting appointed two members (Paul Seemayer and Terri Welch) to liaise with Town Council meeting was unclear as to who and how to talk and what the new setup is now that staffing at the Assembly Hall and elsewhere on the council has been reduced. There was a universal desire to work with and in partnership with the council - help fill gaps, perhaps, but not to take over.

We note other town / models working well - mention made of the Cheese and Grain in Frome. Suggestion made to get in touch - but we already are and have some really useful feedback. Suggestions made about running / working as a CIC, and we have experience in the group at that. And we have ... so much rich expertise and enthusiasm.

Within those present, all agreed to sharing of names and email addresses WITHIN THE GROUP so we can easily communicate.

Next meeting - 19:00 on 16th September, same venue in real life, online link for Zoom



Published Monday, 13th September 2021

Melksham Transport User Group

The Melksham Transport User Group ( (MTUG) ) looks after the interests of Melksham's public and sustainable transport user. We (I am vice chair) are a community group with limited funding, but we have an excellent and well established link with partners in local government and the transport indusrty, with whom we interface for better and better-tuned provision for our residents, visitor and businesses.

Calling for volunteers - we are the "Station adoption" group for Melksham, and we attend events, organise special trips and surveys and - well - enjoy ourselves too. The last 18 months have been like no other, but this autumn we're able to start to revert back to more normal activities, with every expectation that - in leisure travel especially - we'll be going above and beyond what we achieved before.

Our next Melksham Transport User Group meeting will take place on 15th September 2021 at 19:30. It will primarily take place online (via Zoom) but we will have a physical presence too - at this stage my place, where we have a limited room set up and tested for these joint online/offline meetings (details on request)

The code for the Zoom meeting is   ((here))
that’s   Meeting ID: 837 4199 6693, Passcode: 120080
Full Zoom invite   ((here))

If you are coming in person, please let me know head of time so I know numbers

Draft agenda:

1.1 Introduction and test of technology.
1.2 Welcome
1.3 Apologies for absence
1.4 Notes of previous meeting and note-taker for this one

2.1 Train and bus running over the summer
2.2 Station and bus friends activities
2.3 Reports from partners (TransWilts, Council reps, WWRUG, Option 24/7, etc)
2.4 Treasurer’s report

3.1 What's happening to Melksham and Wilshire train services in December?
3.2 What's changing on Bus services before next April?
3.3 Next steps for buses and trains

4.1 Consultation - Priority for People
4.2 Consultation - Wiltshire Climate Strategy

5.1 Santa
5.2 Other "specials" and events
5.3 Publicity

6.1 Any other business

7.1 Date of next meeting


Published Sunday, 12th September 2021

Staff and role changes at MTC

The roles of Economic Development Manager and Hospitality and Facilites Manager have been declared "redundant" and the officers in those roles left the Town Council at the end of last month. Huge "thank you" to David and Tim for all the work you have done for the town - it's appreciated far more than may have been apparent at a time like this.

Which leads to the question "what now"? I'm not the only one to be wondering - a letter from a resident asked some questions of one of his councillors (different ward) who has circulated all councillors. I'm copying the answers here, with prior permission of the resident, I will add my comments in footnotes.

Q: Who will now take responsibility for economic development in and around Melksham, and how are they qualified to do so?

A: The Town Clerk, who has a proven track record in economic development and therefore will take responsibility for economic development. (1)

Q: Equally, who will now take responsibility for managing the Assembly Hall, and how are they qualified to do so?

A: The Amenities Manager who has a track record of working in this field. (1)

Q: Given that both the posts were full time, how is it proposed that council officers will be able to assume the responsibilities of two full time roles into their current jobs?

A: The Head of Paid Service (Town Clerk) has assessed the work and has shared some aspects amongst the rest of the team. (1)

Q: Also, would you explain how the council will ensure that the management of the Assembly Hall will continue at the same standard, given that it was previously considered to be a full time position?

A: The council has been assured by the Town Clerk that the Assembly Hall will be managed properly, council has the utmost confidence in the operation line management of the officer team in all aspects of running the Assembly Hall. Council also welcomes the opportunity to work with the community (FOMAH) to secure the long term future of the Assembly Hall and how it can be better utilised. (2),(4)

Q: Would you also explain the council's rationale in making redundancies before the future of the Assembly Hall was decided?

A: The roles were made redundant post covid. An ongoing review of all services is currently taking place. (3)

Q: Finally, would you let me know which councillor(s) proposed the closure of the Assembly Hall, and who proposed mothballing?

A: This has never been proposed by a councillor. The report before council on the Assembly Hall was authored by officers who presented all possible options. This demonstrates the neutrality of the officer team and that council were given the option to consider dismiss these options. (5)




Footnotes - these are my comments in addition to the other's above

(1) As well as existing staff with appropriate qualifications taking on some of the work, some of the things that previously happened will no longer be done. I already have examples where previous staff help / input is not available in the same way. This may be right; there is no obligation on a Town or Parish council to do anything very much, and the balance if what is done from 2021 to 2024 is up to the new councillors you have elected - 8 on a "Together for Melksham" ticket, 5 on a Conservative ticket, one as a LibDem and one as an independent. Much of the answer to the direction of what will be done should come, therefore, from what you were presented with as policies before the election.

(2) There is no promise that things "will continue at the same standard", nor really should there be. It should be to an appropriate (in my view "high") standard. I have every confidence in the team we now have (right across the staff) but it would be unrealistic to expect all the same things to be done to the same standard and level that they were.

(3) My fellow councillor has provided an excellent answer to, I'm afraid, a different question to the one that has been asked (at least as I read it). On the original question, I'm not sure that this was fully worked out ahead of time - I certainly did not feel informed one way or the other when it was voted on. I only had 5 minutes notice of what we were to vote on, and felt I had no honourable option but to abstain once my request for time to go away and think abut it was denied, and some of the answers being given were less than immediatley convincing.

(4) I am delighted with FoMAH (Friends of Melksham Assembly Hall), the initial objectives of the group, and the door being very much open for it to partner with the Town Council. Also very encouraged indeed to see support from our MP. However, I feel that it would be useful here for me to make very clear:

a) The group wasn't formed - nor even thought about - until after the redundancies had been decides upon and made public. It is / was a reaction to the Town Council's report and meeting to discuss and "decide" future options for the hall in early August, and the strong adverse public reaction to the option of closing or mothballing the hall that was listed in the possibilities. I would be very worried indeed if FoMAH was about helping to put existing staff out of work.

b) We don't know what FoMAH will be doing yet ... a superb initial meeting, and two more set up for this week - the objective of working "with" is superb, agreed, common sense. "How" is being explored during the day, then in the evening, on Thursday

(5) According to the Melksham News in mid-February, one of the councillors at that time (who is still a councillor) suggested that one of the options for the hall would be to close it. He did not (from what I have read) propose that as the way forward - rather more alerting people to the possibility, and perhaps getting a feel for views in watching reactions. The officer's report in early August listed closure / mothballing as a practical option, and discounted carrying on as we were because we would no longer have the same staff level, but it did not recommend any option that councillors should adopt - it left it to us.




Having answered these questions, let's move on in various partnerships with the hands elected and dealt. 95% of the time we are all in agreement, and on the other 5% we can discuss, work out real objectives, and come up with good outcomes.

Published Saturday, 11th September 2021

Dog Bark - KGV Park

The "dog bark" in King George V park has opened, with an article published by the Melksham News ((here)) to announce it, and lots of comment on social media.

I welcome provision for pets. The PDSA tell us that 51% of UK adults own a pet. 26% of UK adults have a dog with an estimated population of 9.6 million pet dogs. For many of us our dogs are family - very much loved, going with us whenever they can, changing our choices when they can't. There are so many places where they cannot go - some obvious, others by the choice of a business which has placed other matters (extra cleaning, customers who don't like dogs perhaps) ahead of the dog owner. So in many ways, the more provisions the better, provided that there are still enough areas where dogs are not allowed, or are required to be on a leash.

Two questions have arisen about the "Dog Bark" - the rules (*), which are far from suiting everyone, and the amount of work (and money) put into the provision.
* Original rules at the base of this post
* Amended within a day [due to public reponse to some elements?]

The voters elected 13 out of 15 councillors in May on platforms of tight financial control - we are in the process of loosing four members of the staff team with only one of them being replaced. And in this environment, something quick and cheap is in-line. It doesn't suit everyone, but of the 10 councillors present at the committee that made the decision to go ahead this way last month, at least three (probably more) have mid-sized dogs of the Labrador / Retriever type in their families for whom the facilities and rules will work. Looking at the stats for "the most popular dog breeds in the UK", the area will probably work for most of these types"
1. Retriever (Labrador) - 39,905
2. French Bulldog - 39,266
3. Spaniel (Cocker) - 25,565
4. Bulldog - 11,594
5. Dachshund (Miniature Smooth Haired) - 10,369
6. Spaniel (English Springer) - 9,123
7. Retriever (Golden) - 8,653
8. German Shepherd Dog - 7,067
9. Pug - 6,033
10. Staffordshire Bull Terrier - 5,010

For those of us with other dogs such as longdogs (e.g. greyhound), lurchers, or miniature (e.g. chihuahua), the boundary fence may be inadequate (I need to take a look) and with any dog (just with any child) there are some who will mix well and others for whom the whole idea of free mixing is fraught with concerns. I don't think the Town Council Committee that put this together ever intended (nor, perhaps, should they) to provide a secure field for use including that by dogs that don't mix, and they have (rightly in my view) placed ultimate responsibility on the dog owner or guardian.

* We have three dogs. The "dog bark" is probably suitable (right away) for Billy. Until I know more, I don't think it will be suitable for Lulu and Lightning (Lulu would be fine on-lead).

* As ever, some initial issues and tuning will no doubt help bed the system in, and I'm sure the Town Council will welcome feedback via your councillor (choose yours on the Assets and Amenities Committee)

* Although I'm a Town Councillor, I am not on that particular committee - I could pass messages on, explain as I understand things, but I'm not a direct contact on this one.

Illustration – not every dog can run offlead in the Dog Bark. Our Lulu, recent picture. She can walk, but not run free.


Footnote:
The rules we are discussing are as follows:
1. All users of the dog park do so at their own risk.
2. Dog owners must be inside the fence in the vicinity of their dogs at all times.
3. YOU are responsible for your dog.
4. Your dog MUST be 'off-lead' once in the dog area
5. Dog poo MUST be scooped and binned appropriately.
6. DO NOT take young puppies (under 16 weeks) into the dog area.
7. Do NOT take young children, toddlers or babies into the dog area.
8. DO NOT physically intervene in a dog fight.


Later on 10th September - a new set of rules has been published:



Published Friday, 10th September 2021

Upcoming Bus Improvements

RESULT! Wiltshire council has announced the first stage of bus service improvements within the current financial year - see ((here)) for a listing of the services right across Wiltshire and ((here)) for the background and supporting documents.

A big "thank you" to Wiltshire Council for these improvements. We (Melksham Transport User Group and the community) were mortified when the 234 service between Chippenham and Trowbridge via Melksham were withdrawn a few years back, leaving the daytime-only x34 service - last bus from Chippenham became 17:30 instead of the (and it was well used) 22:16. (Illustration - 1st August 2015 - the final 234 from Trowbridge to Melksham)

This request is one of the two improvements requested by the Town Council in June. The other request made (extending the town bus to the station to connect with trains) has not proven possible this year due (I understand) to a lack of suitable available drivers at the service operator. It is not off the agenda, though - it's still on the list for "Bus Back Better" to be implemented if it passes muster next year.

Wiltshire Council has also announced extra services on route 69 (Trowbridge - Bradford-on-Avon - Holt - Melksham - Corsham). I have no further details yet - but there have been significant gaps in this service and having them plugged will be very welcome indeed.

The Option 247 group - set up five years ago after the loss of the 234, campaigned to save significant bus cuts in 2016, and those service cuts (partly as a result?) did not happen. We (I am a member) are now working as a community representative group with key contats in 16 (so far) of the 19 community areas. I am delighted to be working with Wiltshire Council - our local transport authority - partnering towards getting the right updates to services. I have quoted three examples (x34 evenings, x34 Sundays and 69) that include Melksham - across Wiltshire, there are no less than 34 (yes, thirty four) improvements planned in coming months and many of them will require community input (which may need to be quick and light) to check that it works for all the partners:
  * The Local Trasport Authority
  * The Bus Operators
and, critically important ...
  * The Passengers who will use the service


Published Wednesday, 8th September 2021

on Personal Electric Vehicles

E-Scooters, Segways, Hoverboards, Electrically assisted bicycles, Sinclair C5, Mobility Scooters ... three are legal on the roads, two are not, and one only if rented and not if purchased.

Now look - I KNOW puchased E-Scooters are illegal to use in public places in the UK, and I KNOW that there are concerns about safety, and I KNOW there are concerns about some of the current uses being made of them.

BUT.

E-Scooters are small, have a tiny carbon footprint even if their electic charge supply is fossil fuel based, rapid, don't take up much highway space, and don't cost a fortune or need a lot of storage. They could be comfortably folded and taken onto a bus or train.

We really - from a climate and economic viewpoint - should be looking for ways to make all these electric personal vehicles legal, safe and available - with light rules and regulations to make them widely available and used.

Clockwise from top left, current status to the best of my knowledge:
Power assisted pedal bicycle - legal, no license
Electric Scooter - legal ONLY in hire locations and driving license required
Sinclair C5 - legal, no license
Electric motor bike - some are legal with AM or 'better' license needed. Picture one is off road only.
(Mobility type) electric tricycle - legal (I think)
Mobility chair - legal; there are two classification with different rules
Hover Board - not legal to use off private land
Segway - not legal to use off private land


Published Tuesday, 7th September 2021
-

Thank you for voting Graham Ellis onto Melksham Town Council

Jump to top of page